Perfectly normal, thank you very much.
7862 stories
·
90 followers

taylorallie13: hotbutterpopcorn: on his way to steal yo...

1 Share




taylorallie13:

hotbutterpopcorn:

on his way to steal yo girl

to tell her about global warming

Read the whole story
Share this story
Delete

can you all signal boost this please

1 Share

karnythia:

ouyangdan:

arcanebarrage:

peoplemask:

thebritishboyfriends:

thebritishboyfriends:

straight from my doctor’s mouth: if you’re in california and were born between 1964-1989 you need to go get a measles booster. at the time you only had one dose of mmr, and now you do two. before 1964 you did two. if you’re in southern california (or any area experiencing a measles outbreak due to idiots who don’t understand herd immunity) PLEASE go get an mmr booster if you can. keep yourself safe.

PLEASE spread the word on this. it’s really important. for more info on the measles outbreak you can have a look here: http://ift.tt/1nKjXpQ

boosting - those of us in the over 25 bucket should probably ask our docs about this

thanks anti-vaxxers, for bringing back an illness that we’d eliminated in the US

Edit: This is legit, btw. I did some fact-checking on the ca.gov health websites. If you were born before 1989, you need to consider an MMR booster. 

If you don’t know if you need a booster, and this is something a lot of people in this age range are dealing with, or you can’t verify your boosters, there is a blood test which can tell you if you need it.

If you have the means to do these things, please do.

Also keep in mind that even if you were vaccinated, the vaccine is only about 95% effective. For some folks (I’m one) it provides only limited immunity even with boosters. You can get the measles even if you’ve been vaccinated.

Read the whole story
Share this story
Delete

1109-83: Joan Jett Blakk ran a militant queer campaign for...

1 Share
Read the whole story
Share this story
Delete

whitegirlsaintshit: god the next line after wards is horrible...

1 Share


whitegirlsaintshit:

god the next line after wards is horrible “shittin’ on the past gotta spit it like a pastor”…. girl WHAT?

Read the whole story
Share this story
Delete

justice4mikebrown:January 31#BooksAndBreakfast Part 1(Part...

1 Share
















justice4mikebrown:

January 31

#BooksAndBreakfast Part 1

(Part 2)

Click here for more info. 

Read the whole story
Share this story
Delete

I'm not sure I follow the argument with Agent Carter. So its a great show for feminism but because it fails to adress racial issues (it just ignores them it doesnt introduce and then kill POCs left and right - hi joss) it should be ignored and made to fail. Because what Marvel and other producers will take away from this is not "oh female super heroes suck"? We will get another show with a dude instead. I mean discuss it with the creaters criticize it but watch the show. so it can get better

1 Share

"So its a great show for feminism, but because it fails to adress racial issues it should be ignored and made to fail" 

imageimage

I’m just… going to repeat the first line here, and let it sit: “So it’s a great show for feminism, but because it fails to address racial issues.” 

image

Motherfucker, HOW can ANYTHING be “great for feminism” if it “fails to address racial issues”? 

image

I hate to inform you of this but WOMEN. OF. COLOR. EXIST. 

What kind of feminism are you practicing, exactly?

If something “fails to address racial issues” it is AUTOMATICALLY bad feminism, bad on gender issues, bad for women. You CANNOT have feminism without antiracism, because “women” are a racialized group, and women face racism. 

Like, jesus christ. 

I just… I’m so stunned by this assertion that something can be “great for feminism” while failing on racial issues. Great for whose feminism, exactly? For white women’s feminism? Because I’m not playing the “we’ll get to women of color EVENTUALLY” game. That’s not feminism. 

That’s white supremacy. 

(I mean, literally. It’s “white people come first, and THEN we’ll deal with people of color’s issues. It is LITERALLY white supremacy) 

image

"(it just ignores them, it doesnt introduce and then kill POCs left and right - hi joss)" 

Y’all out there who think it’s somehow better to IGNORE people of color than to fridge them - you realize that ERASING people of color is violence, right? 

Ignoring black and brown bodies is violent because it’s the kind of discursive and aesthetic rhetoric that ALLOWS us as a nation to ignore black and brown bodies in our public policy. Because we never see black and brown people in our culture, they’re never made human for us. We’re given tacit permission to never give a shit about them, which is why we don’t give a shit when they’re *literally* murdered through economic and state-sanctioned violence.

It’s not “better” to ignore racial issues than it is to “introduce and kill POC.” Neither of them is “better.” They’re both racist, they’re both forms of white supremacist violence. 

But hey, AT LEAST the actors of color in Joss Whedon’s shows are getting PAID. 

"It should be ignored and made to fail." 

You realize no one is actively trying to make Agent Carter fail, right? 

What I’ve seen is people on tumblr saying that we MUST watch Agent Carter because it’s SUCH a good show on feminism and social justice, and so anyone who cares about those issues MUST watch it. 

And at a bunch of other people are pointing out that ACTUALLY, Agent Carter isn’t all that great on feminism and social justice. 

If your premise is that I should watch Agent Carter because it’s “great on feminism,” then it better be fucking great on feminism. And it’s not. 

Me pointing that out isn’t me trying to “make it fail.” No one is organizing a boycott. No one is writing letters to the TV studios trying to get it off air. We’re just resisting the idea that it’s the second coming of Social Justice TV (tm). 

I love that refusing to buy into the logic that a show MUST be great social justice because it has a white female protagonist means we’re attacking it, and want it to die with fire. Please. 

"Because what Marvel and other producers will take away from this is not "oh female super heroes suck"? We will get another show with a dude instead."

The fact that the entertainment industry takes the failure of female-led shows as a sign that ALL female-led shows suck is not our fault. That phenomenon is a product of misogyny, not of feminist not trying hard enough to make Peggy Carter a success. 

We are not responsible as individuals for magically changing an institutional problem. 

And the flip-side of this is that Peggy Carter succeeding does not automatically mean more female superheroes will appear. I remember a couple years ago with Bridesmaids, everyone was like “oh, you have to see this, or we’ll never get smart female comedies again!” 

And Bridesmaids did really well… and we didn’t suddenly get an influx of smart female-led, female-written comedies. Because *misogyny* is the problem. 

I happen to know that Marvel did a study after the release of Avengers to see what people thought of the characters, and two highest rated characters were the Hulk and Black Widow. 

Guess who HASN’T gotten a movie? 

Yeah, because actually, Marvel DOESN’T always listen to the market. Marvel doesn’t always listen to the fans. Marvel doesn’t always do what would make the most money. A lot of the time, Marvel will IGNORE THE EVIDENCE, because institutional oppression is not magically solved by capitalism, 

image

It’s not that we’re not trying hard enough to promote female characters. Misogyny is the problem.  

So please stop this bullshit guilt-tripping of people because they’re not watching #SolidarityIsForWhiteAgents. 

"I mean discuss it with the creaters, criticize it but watch the show. so it can get better." 

Ah, yes, I will just pick up my cellular telephone and call up the creators, who are close personal friends of mine, and tell them to cast Dichen Lachman, Q’orianka Kilcher, John Cho and Derek Luke. I don’t know why I didn’t think of that before! Racism solved. 

I hate to burst your adorable innocent bubble, but people asking the entertainment industry to cast more people of color has not worked out very well so far. 

Also, your logic is pretty classic abusive relationship logic. “Ah, yes, this show is terrible. But you must STAY WITH IT to make it better. ” Uh, no. No, I must not? The show is not going to get better because I watch it. It is not going to get better because it has higher ratings (if anything, that’ll convince the creators they’re doing something RIGHT). If I am not enjoying a show, for whatever reason, I am not obligated to stick around and “make it better” through the power of… osmosis, or something. 

image

On a sidenote, I was totally planning to watch Agent Carter eventually, once grad school calmed down a bit. But defenders of the show trying to guilt trip people into watching it because it’s greatest thing for feminism since Margaret Sanger, and then responding to criticisms of the show’s supposed feminism with white supremacist logic of “it’s good for WOMEN and it’ll get better on people of color EVENTUALLY” is… really turning me off the idea. 

image

If I ever needed more proof that Solidarity is For White Women, this discussion has been it.* 

*(I didn’t need more proof) 

Read the whole story
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories